Customers and contacts
Keep relevant records aligned between a CRM, portal and internal application.
An API integration lets existing applications exchange data without retyping it. Tixer assesses how your CRM, ERP, accounting or custom software can connect and which system remains authoritative. The capabilities of the systems involved determine what is feasible.
From customer records and orders to status and invoicing: every data flow has a clear source, destination and check.
The most useful integration follows the process. First we establish which information is needed and which system remains authoritative.
Keep relevant records aligned between a CRM, portal and internal application.
Pass a confirmed order to the system responsible for the next step.
Show current information wherever staff or customers need it.
An integration is only useful when problems are visible. We design exchange with validation, logging and a clear recovery path.
Check the API or exchange method first
Define data and access boundaries
Expose errors and missing information
Track changes in connected systems
We review documentation and sample data, agree on fields and rules, build the connection and test failure cases. The connection then becomes part of ongoing maintenance.
Inventory systems and data flows
Define fields, direction and exceptions
Test with real processes
Monitor and adjust after launch
Imagine an approved order needs to move from an internal application to accounting software. First agree which information is required and which system owns customer records, amounts and status.
A missing customer reference needs correcting before the order is sent. If no confirmation arrives, first check whether the receiving system already processed the order. Sending it again without checking can create duplicates.
Start only after approval from the person authorised to release the order
Validate the customer reference, required fields and unique order reference
Send the order and record the reference returned by the receiving system
Show confirmed delivery or flag an error for follow-up
Connecting systems starts with access and documentation. An API does not automatically expose all records or actions; restrictions vary by supplier and subscription.
An API may be read-only, exclude certain fields or require additional permissions. An integration cannot be promised without a reliable exchange method.
A webhook can announce a change; scheduled retrieval introduces a delay. Request limits and outages also affect how current the data can be.
Fields, statuses and customer references can mean different things. When both systems accept changes, agree which source takes precedence and who resolves conflicts.
For Villa Vintour, Tixer connected the website to an external booking provider that keeps availability in sync with Booking.com. The provider handles coordination between booking channels. Available data and actions depend on what that provider supports.
OriginArt had a different constraint: its original archive ran on one computer and did not allow new fields. Tixer built a migration and cleanup tool for a staged transition while the old database remained available. This data migration enabled a controlled move to the new browser platform.
Read how a booking provider keeps availability in sync with Booking.com.
Read the case: Villa Vintour: website and booking calendarRead how existing records were cleaned and transferred in stages.
Read the case: OriginArt: data from a local systemClear answers to common questions.
Sometimes a reliable import, export or another supported interface is available. File exchange can work when periodic processing is sufficient. Without safe access to the required data, an integration may be limited or infeasible; we investigate this first.
No. It depends on webhooks, request limits and the capabilities of both systems. Sometimes changes are retrieved periodically. We agree which delays the process can tolerate and how failures are followed up.
The investment depends on available interfaces, field mapping, data direction, validation and failure recovery. A documented API needs a different approach from a restricted export system. We define scope, maintenance and price after assessment.
An API integration lets two software systems exchange information automatically according to agreed rules.
That depends on their capabilities. A usable API, webhook, export or another reliable interface is needed, which we assess first.
Yes, if both systems support it and the source of truth for each piece of information is clear.
An appropriate integration records errors and can use retries or a recovery process. The precise approach depends on the workflow.
Often, yes, once we've reviewed its technology, documentation, access and the versions of the connected systems.
Tell us what information is still moved by hand, and we'll assess what's feasible.